Liam Krall vs Kelly Giese Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
L. Krall vs K. Giese

Liam Krall

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

C. Rank

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Kelly Giese

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

C. Rank

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Krall 1 - 0 Giese

They have played 2 sets in total, with Liam Krall winning 2 and Kelly Giese winning 0. The last match between Liam Krall and Kelly Giese was at the M15 Ann Arbor, 23-09-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Liam Krall getting the victory 6-2 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Krall	1
Giese	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(Q3) M15 Ann Arbor(09-23-25)

Stats

Liam Krall

Kelly Giese

L. Krall vs K. Giese H2H Profile

L. Krall	Stats	K. Giese
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
55.88% (38-30)	Career Total W/L	58.33% (7-5)
1	Hard	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

L. Krall vs K. Giese Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Liam Krall has won 43.96% of points on their second serve, while Kelly Giese has won 36.77%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Liam Krall, in recent form, has won 48.94% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kelly Giese has won 43.57%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.39% and 31.72% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Liam Krall has saved 51.20% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kelly Giese has saved 60.42% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Liam Krall has won 61.40% of matches played (W/L 35/22), with Kelly Giese winning 63.64% (W/L 7/4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Liam Krall has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 31/20), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/5). Kelly Giese has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 7/5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 7/5).
Player level: In the last year, Liam Krall has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.40% of matches (W/L 35/22), where as Kelly Giese has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 7/4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Liam Krall winning 1 times and Kelly Giese being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Liam Krall winning 2 and Kelly Giese winning 0.
The last match between Liam Krall and Kelly Giese was at the M15 Ann Arbor, 23-09-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Liam Krall getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Liam Krall has played against opponents with an average rank of 191.4 while Kelly Giese has played against players with an average rank of 132.09.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Liam Krall has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kelly Giese has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Liam Krall has converted 32.20% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kelly Giese has converted 42.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Liam Krall vs Kelly Giese Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

L. Krall vs K. Giese H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

L. Krall	Stats	K. Giese
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	6
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

L. Krall Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
M15 Lexington - 06-10-2025
R1 Walid AhoudaW. Ahouda	L	1-6 7-6(7) 6-4	Stats
Q3 Matias Ponce De Leon GomilaM. Ponce	W	7-6(3) 6-1	Stats
Q1 Clark MaloneC. Malone	W	6-0 6-0	Stats
M15 Winston-Salem - 29-09-2025
Q3 Niels RatiuN. Ratiu	L	2-6 6-1 10-7	Stats
Q1 Dylan ChangD. Chang	W	6-1 7-6(3)	Stats

View All

K. Giese Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
M15 Ann Arbor - 22-09-2025
Q3 Liam KrallL. Krall	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
Q1 Pierce ShayaP. Shaya	W	7-5 7-5	Stats
M25 Edwardsville - 28-07-2025
Q3 Nicholas SteiglehnerN. Steiglehner	L	6-4 4-6 10-7	Stats
Q2 Ryan ColbyR. Colby	W	7-5 2-1 ret.	Stats
Q1 Piotr LadaP. Lada	W	6-2 6-0	Stats

View All

L. Krall vs K. Giese Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

L. Krall	Stats	K. Giese
55.88% (38/30)	YTD Win/Loss	58.33% (7/5)
55.84% (86/68)	Sets Win/Loss	57.14% (16/12)
53.76% (772/664)	Games Win/Loss	50.89% (143/138)
60.78% (31/20)	Hard Win/Loss	58.33% (7/5)
54.55% (6/5)	Clay Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
16.67% (1/5)	Indoor Hard W/L	0% (0/0)
0.14	Aces Per Game	0.07
100	Aces Total	9
0.19	Double Faults Per Game	0.12
135	Total Double Faults	16
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
189.22	Average Opponent Rank	121.08
56% (1154/2054)	1st Serve %	56% (190/341)
65% (753/1154)	1st Serve Win %	67% (127/190)
47% (424/900)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (73/151)
42% (92/219)	Break Points Won % (Total)	38% (15/40)
42% (838/2001)	Return Points Win %	43% (156/363)
0.00% (0/2)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
57.58% (38/28)	Futures W/L	58.33% (7/5)
56% (38/68)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	58% (7/12)
46% (6/13)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	100% (1/1)
44% (8/18)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (2/4)
84% (43/36)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (5/5)
16% (43/7)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (5/0)
8% (25/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	29% (7/2)